|
|
ALWEG Beam Comparison Chart
another TMS exclusive!
| Endview (to scale) |
Type | Width | Height | Height at Endpoint | Locations |
 |
Disneyland-ALWEG | .51M 20" |
.88M 34.5" |
1.02M ** 40" ** |
Anaheim, CA (1959) |
 |
Disney-Bombardier * | .66M 26" |
1.22M 48" |
2.03M 80" |
Walt Disney World,
FL (1971) Las Vegas, NV (1995) |
 |
Hitachi Type 3 -
Small * (USA: CM-110) |
.7M 27.6" |
1.3M 51.2" |
1.8M 70.9" |
Sentosa, Singapore (2006) |
 |
ALWEG Hitachi Type 2 - Standard * Monorail Malaysia * |
.8M 31.5" |
1.4-1.6M 55.1-63" |
2.2M 86.6" |
Fühlingen, Germany
(1957) Turin, Italy (1961) Inuyama, Japan (1962) Tokyo-Haneda (1964) Tokyo Disney, Japan (2001) Naha, Okinawa, Japan (2003) Kuala Lumpur (2003) |
 |
Hitachi Type 1 -
Large * (USA: CM-120) |
.85M 33.5" |
1.5M 59" |
2.0M 78.7" |
Kitakyushu, Japan
(1985) Osaka, Japan (1990) Tama, Japan (1997) Chongqing, China (2005) |
 |
ALWEG Large | .9M 35.4" |
1.5M 59" |
n/a | Seattle, WA (1962) |
*Systems types currently available for purchase.
**Long beams for 1961 extension.
Notes: While some may point out that this chart proves
a lack of standards, the chart does demonstrate that systems available
for sale today (*) are very similar in dimensions. In fact, the
maximum width difference between largest and smallest beam is
only .19M (7.5"). With only .095M (3-3/4") difference
per side, manufacturers should be able to modify their trains
to fit different beams.
Dimensions compiled and scaled graphics by the Monorail Society
